Nihilism
Someone recently asked me what I was aiming for in life, or if there was a question I wanted to answer. I said something like ‘I would quite like to know why I can’t find any sort of meaning of life that I can be sure of and yet I’m still here’. It seems to me that we must, even if only subconsciously, have some sort of meaning in our lives if we are going to get out of bed in the morning. Even if it is as simple as ‘maybe tomorrow I’ll have something to aim for so I better stick around until then to find out’. For a good while I’ve kept up the claim (and I maintain it now) that all I’m trying to do is work out if there is an answer to the eternal question or not that I can be sure of, a infinite philosophical quest. But the whole problem here is that it is exactly that: infinite, because as a sceptic I can never take anything like this as being certain. So assuming my arguments for no certain knowledge are correct, I’m never going to succeed in this self-assigned quest. Which leaves me back in a position I can’t get out of, and that’s why I’m wondering why I’m still bothering.
This is akin to nihilism, defined by Wikipedia as:
Nihilism (from the Latin nihil, nothing) is a philosophical position which argues that existence is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. Nihilists generally assert some or all of the following:
- Objective morality does not exist.
- No action is logically preferable to any other in regard to the moral value of one action over another.
- In the absence of morality, existence has no intrinsic higher meaning or goal.
- There is no reasonable proof or argument for the existence of a higher ruler or creator.
- Even if a higher ruler or creator exists, mankind has no moral obligation to worship them.
But then does it matter that my arguments don’t get me anywhere? I am managing so far to contentedly move along by simply keeping up this hope, which I know is in vain, that I will out this problems one day (or someone else will do so and tell me). Or as a friend puts it, keeping my eye on where I am on the staircase and worrying only about the next step (a levels, university etc.). I’ve always been someone to live in the future, and occasionally the past, but rarely in the present. But the problem here is that actually, all I’m doing here is accepting the conclusion that the meaning of life is merely the creation of happiness or contentedness which I don’t have any arguments for. I’m just going along with biological conclusions of getting me in the best possible state (happy) for passing on genetic information. Now, there are of course many who take this conclusion of happiness as being the only possible conclusion. But I’m not willing to accept it blindly quite yet. Just because it is what humans often do doesn’t mean it is the actual answer – or that such a thing exists.
As you can see I’ve just gone in a nice big circle with this post. This is because I have no answer to the original question. Any suggestions as comments to this post appreciated.
The best possible state for passing on genetic information is being in bed with a member of the opposite sex.
Happiness is nigh-on irrelevant.
Hi Sean, it’s Eliot.
The question you seem to be struggling with here is the classic, ‘What is the meaning of life?’ However, I don’t believe this is a very good question to ask. Breaking it down, for the following reasons I can only decide that this is a kind of ‘fake question’:
1. Could there be a single thing, an entity called ‘life’ which might have a meaning? Would it have a meaning in the same way things have shapes or colours?
2. Is there only one meaning (singular); I doubt it.
3. Is the meaning of life something that’s built into life, so it’s there even if we never discover it, or is it something outside life?
4. Might the meaning of life be not knowing what the meaning is? Could it be that the journey, the hunt towards the answer is more important than reaching an answer?
In view of all these questions, I can only conclude that life is what you make it. I don’t think meaning is something to be found, but instead something to be created. I don’t think you can scan the world for a meaning, but only look inside yourself. Pretty existentialist, however, I think that’s the school of thought I’m closest to.
My own personal feelings is in line with that nihilism position, and yet I like to live with something more. As you point out, we seem to need at least some subconscious meaning to life- if not a conscious one. I think what you should maybe do is make your meaning into a conscious one- make up a meaning for life. It may be valid- it may not: roll with it. You can’t keep on waiting for meaning to occur, because it already has.
What you need to do is stop looking, and then it becomes possible to find it.
You want to know why you feel intrinsically about things, is that it? Why don’t you think killing people is awesome? Evolutionary reasons? Problem solved…? But are we really tools of our genes, slaves to inexorable destiny. The irony is if you believe that you might as well do what you want because that’s what you’re going to do. But what if the answer is that simple? The trouble is, however simple the answer is, you can never find it; because you don’t know if it exists and even if it seemed like it would, skepticism defeats even that.
That’s why I don’t like skepticism, however sound an idea it is. It’s so boring.